Echteld.net

Research in health and quality of life

SentiMELC: Monitoring quality of end-of-life care: A permanent end-of-life care registration via the Dutch sentinel network of general practitioners

This study is part of a large study aiming at monitoring end-of-life care (MELC) in Belgium and The Netherlands. You will find more information on the MELC project at the project website. Here you will find information on the project in The Netherlands. Principal investigator is Ebun Abarshi, MD.

Investigators
EA Abarshi, MD
MA Echteld, PhD
Prof L Deliens, PhD
B Onwuteaka Philipsen, PhD
L van den Block, PhD     
GA Donker, MD, PhD 

Background
To monitor the quality of end-of-life care in the Netherlands via the sentinel network of general practitioners. A systematic and continuous registration of relevant data, followed by retrospective analysis of patients’ expectations concerning death will provide information on what their recorded desires were and what forms of care they eventually received. Based on this data, quality indicators will be developed to monitor end-of-life care given within and across care settings and patient populations. Problems of patient-transfers, choice of care, type of care and place of death especially around end-of-life abound and several patients do not die in places of their choice. However scientific knowledge on this problem, especially on a national scale is lacking.

Methods
A sentinel network is used to register morbidity retrospectively, called the Continuous Morbidity Registration (CMR). This network coordinates data collection from a representative sample of general practitioners in the Netherlands on a regular basis. Relevant questionnaires have been developed for collection of data on cause of death, frequency of GP-patient contact, transfers, types of care provided, patient preferences, medical decision making, and patient outcomes.

Results
A study on the preferred place of death showed that 69% of the patients preferred to die at home; 19% in a residential home, and 10% in a hospice. The remaining patients (2%) preferred to die in a hospital. 45% of the GP’s were not aware of the patients’ wishes regarding place of death. 45% of the patients did not die at their preferred place of death. In the last 3 months of life, 43 distinct care trajectories and 709 transitions were identified. Being male, having multiple morbidities, and the absence of GP-awareness of a patient’s preferred place of death were associated with having a transition in the last 30 days. Also being ≤ 85 years, having an infection and the absence of a palliative-centred treatment goal were associated with terminal hospitalisation for ≥ 7 days.